Supreme Court asks NIB not to pay $60million judgement debt to Dominion Trustees

The Supreme Court has asked the National Investment Bank (NIB) not to pay the $60million judgment debt the High Court in Accra asked it to pay Dominion Cooperate Trustees Limited in 2013.

The Commercial Division of the High Court, presided over by Mr Justice Amadu Tanko, on February 21, 2013, gave judgement against NIB in favour of Dominion Corporate Trustees Limited of Channel Islands, UK, for the recovery of the sum of US$60 million, plus interest, with effect from January 29, 2009, to the date of final payment.

The Court of Appeal, on July 4, 2013, stayed the execution of the judgement of the Commercial Court pending the outcome of an appeal filed by the NIB.

The bank, whose debt had doubled with a daily interest of $20,000), asked the Court of Appeal to quash the Commercial Court’s decision because it was defective.

NIB lost the appeal and proceeded to the Supreme Court.

In its ruling Wednesday morning, the Supreme Court said Dominion Trustees had no capacity to have initiated the action and that the writ Dominion Trustees filed at the High Court did not indicate they were the real investors, reports Graphic Online’s court reporter, Emmanuel Ebo Hawkson.

Consequently the Supreme Court ordered a cost of Ghc500,000 against Dominion Trustees which was represented by Mr Kwame Pianim, as its investment consultant.

Mr Tsatsu Tsikata represented the NIB as the bank’s counsel.


The suit was commenced against the NIB by Standard Bank Offshore Trust Company, which was later substituted by Dominion Corporate Trustees Limited, on behalf of investors who had purchased promissory notes issued by Eland Ghana Limited and guaranteed by NIB.

Under the terms of the transaction, the investors had to pay a discounted total sum of US$45 million in May 2007, and upon maturity of the promissory notes on January 29, 2009 reap US$60 million, thus earning US$15 million in profit.

During the trial, Mabel Aku Baneseh reported that, the NIB led evidence to show that its Managing Director at the time, Mr Daniel Charles Gyimah, signed the guarantee without any authorisation from the board.

The bank also led evidence to show that the US$45 million was not utilised for the advertised purpose but was rather distributed by Mr Gyimah to Eland Ghana Limited and companies connected to it.

Other beneficiaries were Iroko Securities Limited, London, as well as private individuals, including Mr Gyimah’s son, Stephen. The largest beneficiary was Sphynx Limited, USA, which was given US$24 million. It also emerged that Sphynx Limited was a fully owned subsidiary of Iroko Securities Limited.

In the counterclaim, the bank joined Mr Gyimah, who according to the NIB did not have the mandate to authorise the promissory note. Also joined to the counterclaim was Eland International Ghana Limited.

But the court, in its February 21, 2013 judgement, held a contrary view and declared NIB liable and ordered it to pay the $60 million, with 11 per cent interest, with effect from January 2009 till the day of final payment.

To Top